Name: Retirement Forecasting: Evaluation of Models Shows Need for Information on Forecast Accuracy: Pemd-87-6a (en Inglés)
Price: 98803.00 COP
Availability: InStock
Author: U. S. Government Accountability Office ( ; U. S. Government Accountability Office (
ISBN: 9781289035501

portada Retirement Forecasting: Evaluation of Models Shows Need for Information on Forecast Accuracy: Pemd-87-6a (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Editorial

Bibliogov

Autor

U. S. Government Accountability Office ( ; U. S. Government Accountability Office (

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

128

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

Dimensiones

24.6 x 18.9 x 0.7 cm

Peso

0.24 kg.

ISBN13

9781289035501

Categorías

Política y gobierno

Retirement Forecasting: Evaluation of Models Shows Need for Information on Forecast Accuracy: Pemd-87-6a (en Inglés)

U. S. Government Accountability Office ( ; U. S. Government Accountability Office ( (Autor) · Bibliogov · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo

$ 98.803

$ 164.672

Ahorras: $ 65.869

40% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: Estados Unidos (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Miércoles 14 de Agosto y el Viernes 23 de Agosto.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Colombia entre 1 y 5 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "Retirement Forecasting: Evaluation of Models Shows Need for Information on Forecast Accuracy: Pemd-87-6a (en Inglés)"

GAO reviewed 71 federal retirement models that forecast: (1) federal retirement program costs; (2) the retirement behavior of civilian workers; and (3) the levels and distribution of retirement income. GAO found that: (1) documented models exist for all three retirement outcomes and the efforts to develop and maintain them are considerable; (2) the amount, completeness, and content of the documentation varies between models; (3) retirement decision models have the most complete documentation, while program cost models have the least; (4) maintenance occurs regularly for program cost models, infrequently for retirement decision models, and periodically for retirement income models; (5) for some models, a lapse or discontinuation of essential data sets means that projections are based on antiquated data; (6) there is a lack of published information on forecasting accuracy for most models and little evidence of serious attempts at validation; and (7) the models it reviewed lacked quality and credibility evaluations. GAO believes that agencies need more systematic information on how developers validate their models and the results of those validation efforts.