Name: Quality Assurance: Concerns about Four Navy Missile Systems: Nsiad-88-104 (en Inglés)
Price: 104334.00 COP
Availability: InStock
Author: U. S. Government Accountability Office ( ; U. S. Government Accountability Office (
ISBN: 9781287198703

portada Quality Assurance: Concerns about Four Navy Missile Systems: Nsiad-88-104 (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Editorial

Bibliogov

Autor

U. S. Government Accountability Office ( ; U. S. Government Accountability Office (

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

114

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

Dimensiones

24.6 x 18.9 x 0.6 cm

Peso

0.22 kg.

ISBN13

9781287198703

Categorías

Política y gobierno

Quality Assurance: Concerns about Four Navy Missile Systems: Nsiad-88-104 (en Inglés)

U. S. Government Accountability Office ( ; U. S. Government Accountability Office ( (Autor) · Bibliogov · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo

$ 104.334

$ 160.513

Ahorras: $ 56.180

35% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: Estados Unidos (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Viernes 26 de Julio y el Martes 06 de Agosto.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Colombia entre 1 y 5 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "Quality Assurance: Concerns about Four Navy Missile Systems: Nsiad-88-104 (en Inglés)"

In response to a congressional request, GAO reviewed quality assurance problems on four missile systems, the Phoenix, the Harpoon, the Sparrow, and the High-Speed Anti-Radiation (HARM) missiles, to determine the causes and potential effects of the problems. GAO found that: (1) all the missiles it examined had defects, since they did not completely conform to contract specifications; (2) some defects occurred because of the prime contractor's inadequate manufacturing processes, but subcontractors' poor manufacturing and inadequate quality oversight caused more significant problems; and (3) contractors believed that many of the reported manufacturing defects in soldering were due to the Navy's stringent soldering specifications. GAO believes that the Navy should have: (1) tighter controls over subcontractor production; (2) better reporting of changes in manufacturing processes; and (3) its prime contractors inspect and test subcontractor-manufactured items.