Name: Acquisition Reform: Role of Test and Evaluation in System Acquisition Should Not Be Weakened: T-Nsiad-94-124 (en Inglés)
Price: 106442.00 COP
Availability: InStock
Author: U. S. Government Accountability Office ( ; U. S. Government Accountability Office (
ISBN: 9781289112110

portada Acquisition Reform: Role of Test and Evaluation in System Acquisition Should Not Be Weakened: T-Nsiad-94-124 (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Editorial

Bibliogov

Autor

U. S. Government Accountability Office ( ; U. S. Government Accountability Office (

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

Dimensiones

24.6 x 18.9 x 0.1 cm

Peso

0.06 kg.

ISBN13

9781289112110

Categorías

Política y gobierno

Acquisition Reform: Role of Test and Evaluation in System Acquisition Should Not Be Weakened: T-Nsiad-94-124 (en Inglés)

U. S. Government Accountability Office ( ; U. S. Government Accountability Office ( (Autor) · Bibliogov · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo

$ 106.442

$ 163.757

Ahorras: $ 57.315

35% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: Estados Unidos (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Viernes 26 de Julio y el Martes 06 de Agosto.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Colombia entre 1 y 5 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "Acquisition Reform: Role of Test and Evaluation in System Acquisition Should Not Be Weakened: T-Nsiad-94-124 (en Inglés)"

GAO discussed current and proposed legislation affecting the test and evaluation (T&E) of defense systems. GAO noted that: (1) it generally supports most of the acquisition reform proposals, but most of the T&E reforms should not be enacted because they address perceived rather than actual problems and undermine a key management control over the Department of Defense's (DOD) acquisition process; (2) independent operational T&E is the most realistic way to determine if new defense systems meet performance requirements, but systems developers resent the delays and expense imposed by testing; (3) the T&E reform proposals support DOD use of low-rate initial production despite possible system deficiencies; (4) the T&E reform proposals decrease the priority of T&E in defense systems procurements; (5) many of the systems that DOD allowed to go into production before operational T&E required costly design changes and retrofits; (6) DOD needs to establish controls over low-rate initial production to prevent premature production; (7) acquisition reform legislation should apply to all systems acquisitions; (8) DOD should limit its commitments to defense systems until developers demonstrate that the systems meet performance requirements; and (9) any changes to current T&E legislation would weaken the primary mechanism used to discipline the DOD acquisition process.